Dividend Stocks

The Dividend Daily

Dividend stocks - News, notes, updates, and analysis, delivered fresh daily

Can Mead Johnson Get Back to Its Winning Ways in 2013? (MJN)

Nutrition company, Mead Johnson Nutrition CO(MJN) may have seen declines in 2012, but will the new year bring a recovery for the company?

The Glenview, IL based company surely had a somewhat rough year in 2012. Just before 2012 began, in late December 2011, a Missouri infant was reported dead after becoming sick from a bacterial infection from a formula produced by MJN. Before the new year came, two more infant deaths were reported from the same infection. Although the FDA was unable to find proof that the MJN product was the cause of the three infant deaths, the company still began 2012 with bad press and many consumers hesitate of the company’s brands.

Around this time, the company increased their 26 cent quarterly dividend by 13 percent to 30 cents quarterly.

In February 2012, the company was faced with even more bad press, which resulted in the stock price falling over 4 percent. A Chinese magazine reported that MJN’s baby formula contained a substance called vanillin, which reportedly was an additive for babies, and was reported to be harmful for babies liver and kidneys.

By the summer, the company saw its shares fall again by nearly 2 percent. MJN was seeing a decline in their market share in China, which is an essential market for the company. A competitor in the country had released a major promotion on nutritional products with prices so low, that MJN was having a difficult time competing.

In October, the company released its third quarter earnings report, which revealed a decline of 9 percent. MJN reported that this decline was a direct result of the rising competition in China, as well as sales declines in North America and Europe. The company also blamed a decline in births within the North America and Europe segments as a cause for the reduced sales.

It is no doubt that 2012 wasn’t a great year for Mead Johnson Nutrition, but there may be hope for a recovery in 2013. If MJN can manage to stay away from bad press and maintain an adequate market share in essential markets, the company should be able to see increased sales in the new year.

The company’s well-known brands and international selling relationships should benefit the company’s sales recovery and help the stock price recover from its YTD decline of over 5 percent.

Although MJN reported that low birth rates in 2012 hurt the company, it is possible that high profile expected births in 2013 including the recent announcements of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West and William and Kate’s pregnancies could cause a pregnancy trend in 2013.

Mead Johnson shares were down 46 cents, or -0.76% during Monday morning trading.

The Bottom Line
Despite its troubles in 2012, MJN is still a well-known nutritional provider and is likely to rebound in the new year. Baby formula is big business around the globe and sells at high premiums. With MJN’s established market share around the world, they have great opportunity to succeed.

(MJN) is not recommended at this time, holding a Dividend.com DARS™ Rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars.

Be sure to visit our complete recommended list of the Best Dividend Stocks, as well as a detailed explanation of our ratings system here.

5 Rules of Winning Dividend Investing

FREE Dividend Stock Newsletter

Get the Dividend.com email newsletter to receive:

  • A free copy of our acclaimed report, 5 Rules of Winning Dividend Stock Investing
  • Free daily investing tips and picks from Dividend.com CEO Paul Rubillo
  • Tons of great market analysis and recommendations

Your Email

Free Dividend Newsletter

Get free dividend tips, analysis and updates straight to your inbox

Comments on this Article COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

Comments are closed.

About This Article ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Disclaimer: Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. The author is not registered as an investment adviser. The author may or may not hold positions in the securities mentioned in this article or video. The author relies upon the "publisher's exclusion" from the definition of "investment adviser" as provided under Section 202(a)(11) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and corresponding state securities laws.